182 N.C. App. 324 - Webb v. Hardy’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 130 N.C. App. 729 - Bruce-Terminix Company v. Zurich Ins. Co. · Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc. · 10 N.C. App. 706 - Brantley v. Dunstan · 178 N.C. App. 62 - Duke Energy Corp. v. Malcolm · 137 N.C. App. 274 - Whitaker v. Akers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Further, the evidence presented by the parties must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant. Where a claim is barred by the running of the applicable statute of limitations, summary judgment is appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the continuing course of treatment doctrine is inapplicable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.