182 N.C. App. 739 - In Re HSF’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Koufman v. Koufman · Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of Asheville · 124 N.C. App. 332 - Starco, Inc. v. AMG Bonding & Insurance Services, Inc. · Bromhal v. Stott · 116 N.C. App. 250 - Bromhal v. Stott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[F]indings of fact made by the trial court . . . are conclusive on appeal if there is evidence to support them.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]here no exception is taken to a finding of fact by the trial court, the finding is presumed to be supported by competent evidence and is binding on appeal”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) After making proper findings at a dispositional hearing or any subsequent hearing, the court ... may award custody of the juvenile to a parent or other appropriate person pursuant to G.S. 50-13.1, 50-13.2, 50-13.5, and 50-13.7, as provided in [section 7B-911], and terminate the court's jurisdiction in the juvenile proceeding. (b) When the court enters a custody order under [section 7B-911], the court shall either cause the order to be filed in an existing civil action relating to the custody of the juvenile or, if there is no other civil action, instruct the clerk to treat the order as the initiation of a civil action for custody....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.