State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Howard · State v. Kovack · State v. Taylor · State v. Thomas · State v. Marzolf
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(quoting State v. Howard, 110 N.J. 113, 122 , 539 A. 2d 1203 (1988)). We explained that [t]he requirement that the court be satisfied in that respect serves several salutary ends. It avoids having a defendant enter into a plea hampered by being”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To reduce recidivism, NERA increases the real time period of incarceration of defendants who commit [certain] first- and second-degree . . . crimes by requiring that such defendants serve at least eighty-five percent of the sentence imposed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]lthough a court is not responsible for informing a defendant of all consequences flowing from a guilty plea, at a minimum the court must ensure that the defendant is made fully aware of those consequences that are `direct' or `penal.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.