Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 N.J. 494 - State v. Dalziel

State v. Dalziel’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson · State v. Roth · In Re the Revocation of the License of Polk · State v. Ghertler · Penbaro v. Dover Township

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “standard is one of great deference and `[j]udges who exercise discretion and comply with the principles of sentencing remain free from the fear of second guessing.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The test is not whether a reviewing court would have reached a different conclusion on what an appropriate sentence should be; it is whether, on the basis of the evidence, no reasonable sentencing court could have imposed the sentence under review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is required to consider all of the aggravating and mitigating factors and to find those supported by the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.