Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 OHIOAPP3D 55 - Cargile v. Barrow

Cargile v. Barrow’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Peyko v. Frederick · Pina v. Espinoza · 139 Ohio App. 3d 883 - Nester v. Lima Memorial Hospital · 140 Ohio App. 3d 618 - Neftzer v. Neftzer · 166 Ohio App. 3d 154 - Folmar v. Griffin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen there is a dispute about whether records are privileged, and when a party reasonably asserts that records should remain privileged, the trial court must conduct an in camera inspection of the records to determine if they are discoverable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[p]arties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.