Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Okla. 114 - Bowen v. Bowen

Bowen v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2004 · most notably May v. May (1979), Bishop v. Bishop (1944)

22 state decisions

16019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Davis · Stanfield v. Stanfield · Nelson v. Nelson · Flaxman v. Flaxman · Mitchell v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Alimony allowed to a wife on a decree for divorce from the bonds of matrimony by reason of the fault or aggression of the husband, under the statute in this state, is to be based upon the circumstances of the parties at the time of the divorce, and is not to be modified by subsequent changes in these circumstances. The court has no power, on subsequent application showing circumstances thereafter arising, to increase or diminish the allowance given in the original judgment.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where a divorce is granted the wife because of the fault of the husband, the court in its discretion should make an equitable distribution of jointly acquired property, and may also in its discretion allow the wife alimony out of the property of the husband.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.