Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Okla. 260 - Kurn v. Helm

Kurn v. Helm’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1949
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig County · In Re Gypsy Oil Co. · Grubb v. Smiley · State Ex Rel. Read, Ins. v. Midwest Mutual Burial Ass'n · City of Ashland v. Culbertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The requirements for a valid and binding contract between any person and the board of county commissioners affecting funds in the county highway fund are: First, an appropriation must have been made by the board of county commissioners, and approved by the excise board of said county making an appropriation for the kind of work or material sought to be covered in said contract; second, the records in the county clerk’s office must show an un-expended balance in said appropriation equal to or more than the amount of the contract sought to be made; third, the contract or purchase order must be signed and certified to by the county clerk certifying that there is an un-expended balance in said appropriated fund sufficient to pay the amount of said contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.