182 Or. App. 235 - State v. Turel’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ppellant's open wounds and the fact that he picks at them are insufficient to establish a danger-to-self commitment because there is nothing in the record to put that in context as to how that could present a life-threatening condition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“there is a likelihood that the person probably would not survive in the near future because the person is unable to provide for basic personal needs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“unable to provide for basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for health and safety,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.