Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 SO2D 471 - Gladstone v. Kling

Gladstone v. Kling’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 1993
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1993

5 state decisions

501966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palm Beach Estates v. Croker · Universal Const. Co. v. City of Fort Lauderdale · 60 So. 2d 158 - Tuggle v. Maddox · Tingle v. Hornsby · Kling v. Gladstone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The survivor of a husband or wife, as to property held as an estate by the entirety, does not fall within the affected categories set out in [the Deadman's Statute] so as to exclude testimony of an interested person in regard to transactions with a deceased person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.