Kurtz v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 75 So. 2d 758 - Ball v. Mann · 116 So. 2d 617 - Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bell · Fort v. Hood's Dairy, Inc. · Nuce v. City of Miami Beach · Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Extent of actual physical impairment; (2) Claimant's age; (3) Industrial history; (4) Education of claimant; (5) Inability to obtain work of a type which claimant can perform in light of his after-injury condition; (6) Wages actually being earned after the injury (a factor entitled to great weight); (7) Claimant's ability to compete in the open labor market the remainder of his life, including the burden of pain, or inability to perform the required labor; (8) Claimant's continued employment in the same employ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.