State v. Hebert’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · George Smith Warden v. Lee Robbins · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · Mayo v. Henderson · 636 So. 2d 1069 - State v. Soler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Of the jurors stricken, there were many sufficiently gender-neutral explanations for the use of peremptory challenges including: religious, moral or ethical considerations, self-employed business owners, jurors with medical or psychiatric problems, jurors with family members that had psychiatric problems, one juror who knew the defendant, and those jurors that had misgivings about imposing the death penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebert v. Rogers“[t]he record in this matter reflects that petitioner's counsel used their experience and training in the most skillful manner to properly defend petitioner against the charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebert v. Rogers“fail[ed] to show she received ineffective assistance of trial counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hebert v. Rogers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.