Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

182 So. 3d 36

In re Arata

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 6, 2015

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2015-11-06

Decided 2015-11-06

¶1: ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

¶2| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct: Rules 1.4,. 1.8(h), 8.4(a), and 8.4(c). . Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that William Harrell Arata, Louisiana Bar Roll number 23431, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day, with all but six months deferred.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent,, in accordance with. Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/182/so3d/36 · .json · Public domain