Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

182 So. 3d 5

Malleiro v. Mori

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 30, 2015

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-09-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2018

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-09-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WELLS, J.

¶1(specially concurring).

¶2I agree that the order on appeal admitting to probate a nuncupative will should be reversed. I do so because Florida, while recognizing the validity of notarial wills of non-residents if valid where made, does not recognize a nuncupative will under any circumstance. See § 733.205, Fla. Stat. (2013) (recognizing the validity of notarial wills executed by non-residents); § 732.502(2), Fla. Stat. (20Í3) (settling that wills executed by non-residents will be recognized in Florida if valid where made even if non-compliant with Florida’s statutory mandates for executing a valid will5, but confirming holographic and nuncupa-tive wills are not valid in Florida irrespective of by whom or where executed: “[a]ny will, other than a holographic or nuncupa-tive will, executed by a nonresident of Florida, ... is valid as a will in this state if valid under the laws of the state or country where the will was executed.” (Emphasis added.)).

¶3. See generally § 732.502(1), Fla. Stat. (2013) (requiring that wills be signed by the testator/testatrix in the presence of two witnesses who must also sign the will in the presence of • the testator/testatrix and each other).

/182/so3d/5 · .json · Public domain