Heiskell v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “lot 6”), apparently because they became aware of the fact that on June 13, 2005, Norman recorded in the public records of Brevard County an Affidavit of Trust with respect to that property, The Affidavit of Trust stated that Norman was the trustee, under the Norman M. Giller Trust. 3 . The record on appeal does not contain a full and complete copy of the Norman M. Giller Trust Agreement, nor is it clear that the document was presented to the trial court. 4 . The First Amended Complaint incorporated by reference the allegations contained in the Complaint for- declaratory relief as' count I. 5 . The deed at issue read: To have and to hold all and singular the above described premises, together with the appurtenances and every part thereof, unto the said Marge M. Smith and her assigns for and during her natural life, and upon her death, then unto Morris Siegel, as Trustee. 6 . Section 689.07(4) states as follows: (4) Nothing herein contained shall prevent any person from causing any declaration of trust to be recorded before or after the recordation of the instrument evidencing title or ownership of property in a trustee; nor shall this section be construed as preventing any beneficiary under an unrecorded declaration of trust from enforcing the terms thereof against the trustee; provided, however, that any”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Giller and Grossman v. Giller