Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

182 S.W. 1119

Holt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1916

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1916-02-09

<p>Criminal Law <@=>112íL-Appea:[>-Review— Statement oe Facts.</p> <p>Where no statement of the evidence on the trial accompanies the record, and no bill of exceptions is contained therein, there is nothing in the motion for a new trial which the Court oí Criminal Appeals can review.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2939, 2946-2948; Dec. Dig. <@=j1124.]</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1916-02-09

HARPER, J.

¶1Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

¶2No statement of the evidence introduced on the trial of the case accompanies the record; neither does the record contain any bill of exceptions. Under such circumstances, there is nothing presented in the motion for a new trial we can review.

¶3The judgment is affirmed.

/182/sw/1119 · .json · Public domain