Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 SW 1144 - Hamlett v. Coates

Hamlett v. Coates’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 1980
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1980

21 state decisions

8019151920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of San Antonio v. French · P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McNeill · Boyd v. Jacobs · Trawick v. Martin Brown Co. · Wallace & Co. v. Finberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Malice is where the facts and circumstances show not only that the grounds upon which the writ of sequestration issued were untrue and that there was no probable cause for believing them to be true, but evidences bad motives or such reckless disregard of the rights of the party against whom it is sued out as satisfies the mind that the unlawful act was willfully and purposely done to the injury of such party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.