Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

26 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Neither the appellant nor the State have any formal burden to show harm or harmlessness under Rule 44.2(b). [N]either the State nor appellant must demonstrate harm when [a non-constitutional] error has occurred. Rather, it is the appellate court’s duty to assess harm after a proper review of the record. Accordingly, a conviction must be reversed on direct appeal if the record shows that a defendant was unaware of the consequences of his plea and that he was misled or harmed by the trial court’s failure to admonish him regarding the range of punishment. Thus, a reviewing court must independently examine the record for indications that a defendant was or was not aware of the consequences of his plea and whether he was misled or harmed by the trial court’s failure to admonish him of the punishment range.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. VanNortrick v. State · Gamble v. State

2. “Any other [i.e., nonconstitutional] error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights must be disregarded.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. VanNortrick v. State · Bessey v. State

3. “(1) the applicable range of punishment; (2) the fact that the prosecutor’s punishment recommendation is not binding; (3) the fact that the defendant must obtain the court’s permission to appeal if the punishment does not exceed the prosecutor’s recommendation, except on matters raised by written pretrial motion; (4) the fact that, if the defendant is not a United States citizen, his guilty plea may result in deportation; and (5) the fact that the defendant will be required to register as a sex offender if he is convicted of an offense which requires such registration.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Gamble v. State