Lewis Jacobs v. Dora Marks’s Empirical Analysis
182 U.S. 583 · 1901
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1991 · most notably Angel v. Bullington (1947), Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Bigelow (1909)
8 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Huntington v. Attrill · Carpenter v. Strange · United States v. Parker · Green v. Van Buskirk · Haldeman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This entry is nothing more than the record of a nonsuit, although the customary technical language is net used.” >”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Griggs““This cause having been settled, it is hereby discontinued by consent of both parties, without cost to either party.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Griggs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.