Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Wash. 598 - State v. Ashe

State v. Ashe’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
5
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2007

17 state decisions

5019351940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 7 E.H. Smith 576 - People v. . Peckens · State v. Lindberg · Archer v. State · State v. Devlin · Commonwealth v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A crime may be a single act and immediate in all its consequences and the locality where it was committed is its “vicinage.” On the other hand, a crime may be the result of a series of acts or the result of a single act. The direct consequences may be made to occur at various times and in different localities. The criminal act, the motive of the perpetrator, the cause, and the effect, are but parts of the complete transaction. Wherever any part is done, that becomes the locality of the crime as much as where it may have culminated. Commonwealth v. Jones, 118 Ky. 889 , 82 S.W. 643 , 4 Ann. Cas. 1192. *** Identical, or similar, statutes have been passed in a number of states and in some of them have been in existence for many years. Under such statutes the vicinage of a crime begun in one county and finished in another, or where the cause occurs in one county and the result in another, has been deemed to be in either county. Commonwealth v. Jones, supra; Coleman v. State, 83 Miss. 290 , 35 So. 937 , 64 L.R.A. 807 , 1 Ann. Cas. 406; People v. Crotty, 55 Hun, 611 , 9 N.Y.S. 937 ; People v. Peckens, 153 N.Y. 576 , 47 N.E. 883 (citing with approval the Crotty Case, supra, and others); Archer v. State, 106 Ind. 426 , 7 N.E. 225 ; Robinson v. Commonwealth, 217 Ky. 129 , 288 S.W. 1044 ; State v. Spayde, 110 Iowa, 726 , 80 N.W. 1058 ; Reynolds v. State, 18 Ariz. 388 , 161 P. 885 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 879.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right . . . to have a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county in which the offense is charged to have been committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.