¶1 ¶23 (concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I concur in the lead opinion only as to the holding that the exceptional sentences imposed for Eddie Davis’s and Letrecia Nelson’s convictions for rendering criminal assistance are not legally justified.
¶2*233¶24 I concur in the dissent to the extent that it would hold that the evidence was insufficient to sustain Davis’s and Nelson’s firearm possession convictions.
¶3¶25 I would reverse the Court of Appeals on both issues and remand for resentencing.