Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 WASH2D 463 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy · State v. Hoffman · 105 Wash. 2d 692 - State v. Kwan Fai Mak · State v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A conviction based on split elements may be affirmed '[s]o long as the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the satisfaction of all of the jurors that at least one of the participants [had the requisite intent] and at least one but not necessarily that same participant [committed the criminal act].'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he accomplice liability statute predicates criminal liability on general knowledge of the crime and not on specific knowledge of the elements of the participant's crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Accomplice liability represents a legislative decision that one who participates in a crime is guilty as a principal, regardless of the degree of the participation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.