Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Wash. App. 910 - State v. Sapp

182 Wash. App. 910 - State v. Sapp’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 114 Wash. 2d 77 - State v. Rempel · Higgins v. Arizona Savings and Loan Association · 5 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Furth · 83 Cal. App. 2d 405 - People v. Doggett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not require photographs and other recordings to be authenticated by a witness present for their creation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the matter in question [was] what its proponent claim[ed].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.