Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 182 Wis. 2d 186 - State v. Davids

182 Wis. 2d 186 - State v. Davids’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1162

Relies on Montana v. United States · DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District · Seymour v. Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary · Mattz v. Arnett · Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]s soon as practicable, after a suitable and permanent reservation shall be obtained ... either at their present home or elsewhere ... a just and fair allotment [shall be made].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 194 Wis. 2d 386 - State v. Davids
  2. “full and complete settlement of all obligations of the Government of whatever nature or kind, either expressed or implied, from whatever source the same may have accrued . . ..”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 194 Wis. 2d 386 - State v. Davids
  3. “congressional intent to disestablish the remaining boundaries as they existed when created by the Treaty of 1856.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 194 Wis. 2d 386 - State v. Davids

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.