Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

183 A.D.2d 333

In re Rosenbluth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1992-11-16

Decided 1992-11-16

¶1OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

¶2On April 7, 1992, the respondent pleaded guilty in the *334Supreme Court, Richmond County, to 17 counts of grand larceny in the third degree, a class D felony, and one count of grand larceny in the fourth degree, a class E felony.

¶3Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

¶4Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

¶5Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

¶6Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent, Steven Rosenbluth, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

¶7Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

¶8Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, the respondent Steven Rosenbluth is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.

/183/ad2d/333 · .json · Public domain