State v. Mott’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
July 1997
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Christensen · State v. Ramos · Bechtel v. State · State v. Gonzales · State v. Druke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he character traits of battered women and the presence of those traits in Mott is relevant and admissible to the charged offenses because it provides evidence probative of Mott’s behavior and, if accepted by the jury, would negate much of the evidence the state relied upon to show that Mott acted knowingly or intentionally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barrett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.