Sturtevant v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1923
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the ballot for the purposes of nomination and election should show the .office of associate justice of division two of the district court of appeal of the first appellate district as a single office, for which two persons are to be selected, with all candidates for the office appearing as candidates for that office, and not specially for either of the two associate justiceships to be filled at the election. . . . ” But it was also stated:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Riddle v. Hillhouse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.