Marani v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 32 Cal. 4th 336 - Casa Herrera, Inc. v. Beydoun (2004), Miller v. Fairchild Industries, Inc. (1989)
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Masterson v. Sine · Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC. · 52 Cal. App. 3d 139 - Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC. · 13 Cal. App. 3d 493 - Salyer Grain & Milling Co. v. Henson · Sherman v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The crucial issue in determining whether there has been an integration is whether the parties intended their writings to serve as the exclusive embodiment of their agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is not merely a rule of evidence excluding precontractual discussions for lack of credibility or reliability. It is a rule of substantive law making the integrated written agreement of the parties their exclusive and binding agreement no matter how persuasive the evidence of additional oral understandings. Such evidence is legally irrelevant and cannot support a judgment. [Citation.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the written loan agreement may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior, contemporaneous, or subsequent oral agreements or understandings of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.