Sabi v. Sterling’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1437 (HOPE VI Program Reauthorization and Small Community Mainstreet Rejuvenation and Housing Act of 2003) · 42 U.S.C. § 1437F · 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (§ 804 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey · 45 Cal. 3d 727 - Lungren v. Deukmejian · 52 Cal. 3d 1142 - Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV · 23 Cal. 4th 163 - Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co. · 5 Cal. 3d 730 - County of Alameda v. Carleson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n instances where there is a government rent subsidy, to use a financial or income standard in assessing eligibility for the rental of housing that is not based on the portion of the rent to be paid by the tenant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“lawful, verifiable income paid directly to a tenant or paid to a representative of a tenant,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'rights or interests are injuriously affected by the judgment [or order].'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.