Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 Colo. 4 - People v. Robles

People v. Robles’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Dorman v. State (1981), People v. Drake (1988)

39 state decisions

220197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Lee v. People · Kurtz v. People · Martinez v. People · People v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Standard 13-3.1. Severance of offenses. “(a) Whenever two or more unrelated offenses have been joined for trial, the prosecuting attorney or the defendant shall have a right to a severance of the offenses. “(b) The court, on the application of either the prosecuting attorney or the defendant, should grant a severance of related offenses: “(i) before trial, whenever severance is deemed appropriate to promote a fair determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence of each offense; or “(ii) during trial, whenever, upon the consent of the defendant or upon a finding of manifest necessity, severance is deemed necessary to achieve a fair determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence of each offense. “(c) When evaluating whether severance is ‘appropriate to promote’ or ‘necessary to achieve’ a fair determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence for each offense, the court should consider among other factors whether, in view of the number of offenses charged and the complexity of the evidence to be offered, the trier of fact will be able to distinguish the evidence and apply the law intelligently as to each offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.