Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 F.2d 155 - United States v. Corry

United States v. Corry’s Empirical Analysis

183 F.2d 155 · 1950

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
January 1986
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 1986 · most notably United States v. Rubin (1979), United States v. Tramaglino (1952)

19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

901950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 472

Relies on United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co. · United States v. Sherman · Cowen v. Heinze · Stewart v. People · Frederic Conrad v. David Griffey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Criticism it also made of the admission of evidence tending to prove that the defendant became interested in counterfeiting in 1945, some three years before the incident in suit. This evidence was competent as bearing on the intent of the defendant, if shown to have been in the possession of counterfeit money. It is argued that the evidence is too remote in time to furnish any proof of intent that would attach to occurrences so long afterwards. The testimony certainly was some indication of intent to defraud by the use of counterfeit money, and its admissibility was a matter fully within the discretion of the trial judge. II Wigmore, § 316(2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.