Hinley v. Burford’s Empirical Analysis
183 F.2d 581 · 1950
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2019
4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tilghman v. Hunter · Cobb v. Hunter · Casebeer v. Hudspeth · Wagner v. Hunter · Pelley v. Matthews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here is evidence to the effect that appellant was convicted on the false testimony of his daughter, the alleged rape. But ... there is no testimony ... that such testimony was knowingly and intentionally used by the prosecution to obtain the conviction. The writ must therefore be denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Farrar v. Raemisch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.