Charles Roberts v. Progressive Independence Inc Sharon Johnson Johnny Hobaugh Melvin Hall Glenn Haring Robert Vanhoozer Ervin Keith’s Empirical Analysis
183 F.3d 1215 · 1999
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2017
7 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bragdon v. Abbott · Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado · Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc. · Rogers v. International Marine Terminals, Inc. · Myers v. Hose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]easonable accommodation[s] are those accommodations which presently, or in the near future, enable the employee to perform the essential functions of his job”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“mental problem doesn't affect [her] from working at all.” Jacques Dep. at 119. 2 . The Court notes that Jacques does not claim that DiMarzio regarded her as disabled from working. 1 . The Court has no knowledge of the issue that divided the panel in Deane or if there was an explanation for the holding on the availability of reasonable accommodations for "regarded as” plaintiffs since that case is unreported and not located on any electronic database. 2 . The ADA provides an incentive for employers to engage in the interactive process in good faith by precluding compensatory and punitive damages against employers that make "good faith efforts, in consultation with the person with the disability ... to identify and make a reasonable accommodation....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e must affirm if, viewing the record in the light most favorable to the non-movant, there is evidence upon which the jury could properly return a verdict for the non-movant. In conducting our review, we do not weigh the evidence, pass on the credibility of witnesses, or substitute our own conclusions for that of the jury. However, we must enter judgment as a matter of law in favor of the moving party if there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis with respect to a claim or defense under the controlling law. Id. at 1219-20 (quotations, citations, and alterations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.