Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 F.3d 916 - Delange v. Dutra Const. Co., Inc.

Delange v. Dutra Const. Co., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
5
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc. (2000), Thornton

16 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

3401999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los Santos · McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander · Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis · Bolker v. Commissioner · Harbor Tug and Barge Company v. Papai

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““a big part” of his job was to serve as a lookout, cargo stower, line handler, and occasional pilot when the barge was being moved — all of which are clearly seaman’s duties — and only devoted 10% of his time to carpentry. He also stated that more than 80% of his time was spent onboard the barge where “most” of the work involved crewman and deckhand duties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Cabral was hired to work on Barge 538 as a crane operator and not as a crew member. Cabral presents no evidence showing that he was ever aboard Barge 538 when it was anywhere but the Ford Island Ferry project.... Furthermore, Cabral presents no evidence showing that he would continue to work aboard Barge 538 after the Ford Island Ferry project was completed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]here, as here, the nonmoving party relies only on his own affidavit to oppose summary judgment, he cannot rely on conclusory allegations unsupported by factual data to create an issue of material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.