Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 F.3d 97 - Robert Scott Jonathan Scott v. Real Estate Finance Group Era Gatewood Realty Inc Ira Simonoff Aa Premier Realty Ltd Remax Premier Realtors Inc Rose Petrokiewicz

Robert Scott Jonathan Scott v. Real Estate Finance Group Era Gatewood Realty Inc Ira Simonoff Aa Premier Realty Ltd Remax Premier Realtors Inc Rose Petrokiewicz’s Empirical Analysis

183 F.3d 97 · 1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
July 2023
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2023

2 district ·

201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lockheed Corporation v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary of the Air Force · Northrop v. Hoffman of Simsbury, Inc. · Ace Auto Body & Towing, Ltd. v. City of New York · Zamora v. Valley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Grand Junction · Baker v. Bronx-Westchester Investigations, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “parties to a transaction may elect to structure their negotiations in such a way that those negotiations — no matter how apparently detailed — constitute expressions of interest that are too inchoate to give the landlord a “legitimate business need for the information in connection with a business transaction involving the consumer” within the meaning of Section 1681b(3)(E) [now 1681a(3)(F) ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.