United States v. Peyton’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2119 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Taylor v. United States · Doyle v. Ohio · Shepard v. United States · United States v. Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Doyle applies only in the context of post- Miranda silence. See Fletcher v. Weir, 455 U.S. 603, 607 , 102 S.Ct. 1309 , 71 L.Ed.2d 490 (1982) (holding that Doyle does not apply to the use of post-arrest, pr e-Miranda silence); Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231, 238-39 , 100 S.Ct. 2124 , 65 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980) (holding that Doyle does not apply to the use of pre-arrest, pr e-Miranda silence); Combs v. Coyle, 205 F.3d 269, 280 (6th Cir.2000) (noting that, under Doyle, receipt of the Miranda warnings is key).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.