Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 FSUPP 467 - Switzer v. Watson

Switzer v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
April 1982
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 145

Relies on Abbott v. Coe · Washington v. Summerfield · Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Sun Oil Co. · Brownell v. Kaufman · In re Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the limitation of the appealed claims calling for an oxygen-containing liquid as a constituent of the penetrant liquid is fully supported in parent specification Serial No. 606,708”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “entitled to rely as to all of claims 1-5 on the filing date of application Serial No. 606,708 and that the Canadian patent to Sockman et al. is, therefore, not a statutory bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “relatively nonvolatile liquid (or portion) consisting essentially of an oxygen-containing organic liquid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.