183 F. Supp. 2d 789 - TFWS, Inc. v. Schaefer’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. · Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias · Crowley v. Christensen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one of the fundamental laws of economics — that of the downward sloping demand curve, which states that as the price of a product rises, the quantity demanded of that product falls.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“adequately substantiated [Maryland's] avowed [temperance objective] of preventing undue stimulation of alcohol sales and consumption through regulation of price competition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“lack[ed] the persuasiveness of the evidence offered by the [Comptroller], in the form of the expert testimony of Drs. Chaloupka and Levy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.