Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 Ga. App. 103 - Chapman v. Burks

183 Ga. App. 103 - Chapman v. Burks’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably 243 Ga. App. 544 - Carter v. Glenn (2000), 189 Ga. App. 340 - Bohannon v. Futrell (1988)

21 state decisions

1201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc. · Eiberger v. West · 173 Ga. App. 594 - Curlee v. Mock Enterprises, Inc. · Tri-Cities Hospital Authority v. Sheats · 150 Ga. App. 234 - Lowe v. Pue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Minors and persons who are legally incompetent because of mental retardation or mental illness, who are such when the cause of action accrues, shall be entitled to the same time after their disability is removed to bring an action as is prescribed for other persons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “so mentally incompetent (non compos mentis or insane), so unsound in mind, or so imbecile in intellect, that he could not manage his ordinary affairs of life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he test is one of capacity—whether the individual, being of unsound mind, could not manage the ordinary affairs of his life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.