183 Ga. App. 641 - Sharp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2015
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Evitts v. Lucey · Humphrey v. State · Valenzuela v. Newsome · Gillen v. Bostick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is elementary that an oral [or written] order is not final nor appealable until and unless it is reduced to writing, signed by the judge, and filed with the clerk. OCGA § 5-6-31, and Bishop v. State, 176 Ga. App. 357, 358 ( 335 SE2d 742 ) (1985); OCGA § 9-11-58, and Crowell v. State, 234 Ga. 313 ( 215 SE2d 685 ) (1975).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Asserted prejudice based upon induced error is impermissible. (Cit.) [Cit.] Sharp v. State, 183 Ga.App. 641, 643 (3), 360 S.E.2d 50 (1987).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.