Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 Md. 59 - Stirn v. Stirn

Stirn v. Stirn’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2006 · most notably Dougherty v. Dougherty (1946), Wentzel v. Montgomery General Hospital, Inc. (1982)

26 state decisions

601944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hood v. Hood · Collier v. Collier · Saltzgaver v. Saltzgaver · Timanus v. Timanus · Barnard v. Godfrey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““From this language it will be seen that courts of equity in this state have full power, and it is their duty, to determine who shall have the custody, control and guardianship of minor children, and who shall be charged with their maintenance and support, when applied to by any of the persons mentioned in the statute; and this without regard to the question of whether or not the parents of said child or children have been divorced or are living apart.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.