Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 Md. App. 312 - Lorincz v. Lorincz

183 Md. App. 312 - Lorincz v. Lorincz’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 109 Md. App. 1 - Wagner v. Wagner · Wills v. Jones · 102 Md. App. 212 - Reuter v. Reuter · 90 Md. App. 406 - John O. v. Jane O. · 96 Md. App. 313 - Goldberger v. Goldberger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) his or her current physical condition; (2) his or her respective level of education; (3) the timing of any change in employment or other financial circumstances relative to the divorce proceedings; (4) the relationship between the parties prior to the initiation of divorce proceedings; (5) his or her efforts to find and retain employment; (6) his or her efforts to secure retraining if that is needed; (7) whether he or she has ever withheld support; (8) his or her past work history; (9) the area in which the parties live and the status of the job market there; and (10) any other considerations presented by either party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is true that parents who impoverish themselves “with the intention of avoiding child support ... obligations” are voluntarily impoverished. But, as the court recognized in Goldberger, 96 Md.App. at 326-27 , 624 A.2d 1328 , a parent who has become impoverished by choice is “voluntarily impoverished” regardless of the parent’s intent regarding his or her child support obligations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.