Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 MICH 51 - Hartlerode v. Thomas

Hartlerode v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2018

10 state decisions

3019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ross v. Conway · Conklin v. Conklin · Gumtow v. Janke · In re Bromley's Estate · Bear v. Stahl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ ‘ There are certain cases in which the law indulges in the presumption that undue influence has been used, as where a patient makes a will in favor of his physician, a client in favor of his lawyer, or a sick person in favor of a priest or spiritual adviser, whether for his own personal advantage, or for the advantage of some interest of which he is a repre sentative.” In re Hartlerode’s Estate, 183 Mich. 51, 60 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.