State v. Hansen’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1962
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pillsbury v. Foley · State v. Hansen · State v. Riebel · State ex rel. School District No. 74 v. County of Lincoln · Fitzgibbins v. Yennie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Such an order is not appealable. It does not involve the merits of the action, nor is it an order which in effect determines the action, nor does it prevent a judgment from which an appeal may be taken.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dady v. Peterson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.