Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 N.C. App. 631 - State v. Bowman

183 N.C. App. 631 - State v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Negron v. United States · State v. Hennis · State v. Fritsch · State v. Barnes · State v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““‘Circumstantial evidence may withstand a motion to dismiss and support a conviction even when the evidence does not rule out every hypothesis of innocence.’” State v. Fritsch, 351 N.C. 373, 379 , 526 S.E.2d 451, 455 (quoting State v. Barnes, 334 N.C. 67, 75 , 430 S.E.2d 914, 919 (1993)), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 890 , 148 L. Ed. 2d 150 (2000). When the evidence presented amounts to circumstantial evidence, “the court must consider whether a reasonable inference of defendant’s guilt may be drawn from the circumstances.” Id. “Once the court decides that a reasonable inference of defendant’s guilt may be drawn from the circumstances, then ‘ “it is for the jury to decide whether the facts, taken singularly or in combination, satisfy [it] beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is actually guilty.” ’ ” Id. (emphasis in original).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand a motion to dismiss and to be submitted to the jury, the trial court must determine whether there is substantial evidence (1) of each essential element of the offense charged, or of a lesser offense included therein, and (2) of defendant’s being the perpetrator of such offense. Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as is necessary to persuade a rational juror to accept a conclusion. The trial court must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.