Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 NW2D 644 - State v. Moon

State v. Moon’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
October 1983
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Boykin v. Alabama · Gideon v. Wainwright · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From the foregoing it becomes evident that whenever an in-custody accused in any manner or at any time invokes his right to counsel, any questions thereafter asked of, or statements made to him which are likely to, expected to, or do in fact elicit a confession, including the affixing of his signature to any inculpatory or exculpatory written document, consti tute a part of the Miranda proscribed interrogation process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the individual indicates in any manner, at any time prior to or during questioning, that he wishes to remain silent, the interrogation must cease .... If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.