Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 OHIOAPP3D 384 - Brown v. Brown

Brown v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. · Whitaker-Merrell Co. v. Carl M. Geupel Construction Co. · 136 Ohio App. 3d 211 - Harkai v. Scherba Industries, Inc. · Burns v. Morgan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the judgment fails to speak to an area which was disputed, uses ambiguous or confusing language, or is otherwise indefinite, the parties and subsequent courts will be unable to determine how the parties' rights and obligations were fixed by the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] fundamental principle in the interpretation of judgments is that, in order to terminate the matter, the order must contain a statement of relief that is being afforded to each of the parties to that action on each of the claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is a fundamental rule that a judgment must be complete and certain in itself”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.