Brown v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. · Whitaker-Merrell Co. v. Carl M. Geupel Construction Co. · 136 Ohio App. 3d 211 - Harkai v. Scherba Industries, Inc. · Burns v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the judgment fails to speak to an area which was disputed, uses ambiguous or confusing language, or is otherwise indefinite, the parties and subsequent courts will be unable to determine how the parties' rights and obligations were fixed by the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gemmell v. Anthony“[A] fundamental principle in the interpretation of judgments is that, in order to terminate the matter, the order must contain a statement of relief that is being afforded to each of the parties to that action on each of the claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is a fundamental rule that a judgment must be complete and certain in itself”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gemmell v. Anthony
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.