McCumbers v. Puckett’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 138 Ohio App. 3d 57 - Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLC · 154 Ohio St. 286 - Trattar v. Rausch · 111 Ohio St. 341 - Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. Donovan · Cadwallader v. Scovanner · 17 Ohio App. 2d 146 - Monroe Bowling Lanes v. Woodsfield Livestock Sales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prescriptive easements are not favored in law, because the legal titleholder forfeits rights to another without compensation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hacker v. House
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.