Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 OHIOAPP3D 77 - Frazier v. Swierkos

Frazier v. Swierkos’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Malone v. Courtyard by Marriott Ltd. Partnership · Osler v. City of Lorain · Jenkins v. Krieger · 88 Ohio App. 3d 432 - Bailey v. Allberry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[I]n order to set aside a damage award as inadequate and against the manifest weight of the evidence, a reviewing court must determine that the verdict is so gross as to shock the sense of justice and fairness, cannot be reconciled with the undisputed evidence in the case, or is the result of an apparent failure by the jury to include all the items of damage making up the plaintiff's claim.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the purpose of Civ.R. 59(A) is to empower the trial court to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.