White v. Westfall’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
107 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Murphy v. City of Reynoldsburg · 87 Ohio App. 3d 704 - Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. · 101 Ohio App. 3d 38 - Coventry Township v. Ecker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'We must affirm the trial court's judgment if any grounds the movant raised in the trial court support it.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“an appellate court conducts an independent review, without deference to the trial court's determination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“State v. S.R., 63 Ohio St.3d 590, 594 (1992). If the statutory language is plain and unambiguous, the court must apply the statutory language. White v. Westfall, 183 Ohio App.3d 807 , 2009-Ohio-4490 , ¶ 16 (10th Dist.).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. North
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.