Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 183 Okla. 122 - Commons v. Bragg

Commons v. Bragg’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2004

24 state decisions

10019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wetmore v. Markoe · Audubon v. Shufeldt · Hollis v. Bryan · Littleton v. Littleton · Stirgus v. Stirgus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purpose of giving an exemption was to keep the allowance for the soldier and his dependents. '* ° * We also find it is the general rule, supported by the weight of authority, that alimony is not a debt within constitutional or statutory provisions against imprisonment for debt. It being held that an order for the payment of alimony possesses different characteristics from an ordinary debt, since it is designed to secure the performance of a legal duty in which the public has an interest. Cain v. Miller [ 109 Neb. 441 ], 191 N. W. 704 , 30 A. L. R. 125.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * It would indeed be anomalous to hold that by reason of the exemption from claims of creditors * * * the injured employee could avoid his obligation to support and maintain his wife and children when in fact the exemption was to assure them, as well as the husband, the necessities of life during his disability.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “1 ‘ Claims Non-assignable — Exempt From all Process. Claims for compensation or benefits due under this Act shall not be assigned, released or commuted except as provided by this Act, and shall be exempt from all claims of creditors and from levy, execution and attachment or other remedy for recovery or collection of a debt, which exemption may not be waived.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.